One of the reasons why I am working with Solid is that it embraces interoperability as one of its core values. But there is a lot of nuance about what that looks like in practice. In this blog post, I share my thoughts on the topic. https://noeldemartin.com/blog/interoperable-serendipity
If you enjoyed this post, we have been talking about it in the Solid Forum and the Zero Data Chat:
https://forum.solidproject.org/t/interoperable-serendipity/4738
https://chat.0data.app/t/interoperable-serendipity/43
Join us!
Nice, the article is also on HN now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28851076
@humanetech @noeldemartin I was just going to mention that! :)
@humanetech cool, thanks for letting me know :D
I still have to read your response in the forum, but I think it's ok to talk about that, you can't always separate tech from people. If it goes too much off topic you can always branch into a new topic.
@noeldemartin afraid I broadened the scope of the topic a bit in response to another reaction on the forum thread 😳
But where it relates to #interoperability is that imho all the social aspects of people 'interoperating' during the specification process are key to the success of the #Solid project as a whole.
Do people broadly understand the objectives, the process? Are they involved and engaged? Does it address their needs?
I find it hard to gauge if this is well addressed in #SolidProject.